Cases 11 - 20 of 90,931
Ralls v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv00149
Defendant:
Judge John Doe
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Ralls, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Fontino et al
as 9:2024cv01152
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, Tami M. White, Joseph M. Betar and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario v. Marbrey et al
as 5:2024ct03229
Defendant:
J.S. Marbrey, R. Cardoza, John Doe 1-12 and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Rosario and Luis Rafael Garcia Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooden v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv01624
Defendant:
Michael Swartz, Uriah Melton, John or Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Wooden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lancaster v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Martha Lancaster
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Monica McCoy and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Chevalier et al
as 2:2024cv02696
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harper
Defendant:
Lessie Rainey, John T. Chevalier, Shelby County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Duron-Rodriquez v. Ledesma et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Defendant:
John/Jane Does, Joyce, Kerry L Kuffenkam and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Duron-Rodriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks #056530 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Defendant:
Unknown Grant, Unknown Party, Unknown Pacheco and others
Plaintiff:
John J Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. Kemp et al
as 4:2024cv00811
Defendant:
Cody Hiland, Shawn Womack, Stephen Tabor and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Noble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Randall et al
as 3:2024cv00981
Defendant:
John Doe, Roman, Ja'Riyah M. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
