Cases 21 - 30 of 7,930
Webster v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Tom Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sykes v. Watt et al
as 4:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
James Elwyn Sykes
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Watt, FNU Starky, T. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashlock v. Coke County et al
as 3:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Ashlock
Defendant:
Coke County, Midland County and Tom Green County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03239
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuck v. Cook County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03251
Plaintiff:
William Tuck
Defendant:
Cook County Correctional Facility and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drew v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2024cv08073
Plaintiff:
Corey Drew
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Dennis M McGrane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 24-6362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., VANMETER, Nurse and others
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA JOHN DOE, TOM HESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01731
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA JANE DOE, MARLIN ZIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
