Cases 1 - 10 of 938
Rodarte (PS) v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rodarte
Defendant:
Larry Cox, Virgil Ensey, Virgina Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ronald Haynes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hodge, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR MOORE
Defendant:
DR. HODGE, (CSP), MARSHALL GRIFFITH, (CSP) and WARDEN LITTLE
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Harvey et al
as 1:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Mr. Brandon L. Griffith
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Harvey, Captain Payne, C.O. DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant:
OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. Stephens et al
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
Jason Dale
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Jimmy Stephens, Sheriff Tom Hughes, Jail Administrator Jacob Schook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
