Cases 1 - 10 of 56,746
Ware v. Jennings et al
as 4:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Supastar Ware
Defendant:
E. Jennings, H. Turner, Unknown Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carey v. Booza et al
as 2:2024cv01717
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Carey
Defendant:
Gregory Booza and Christian Juarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCorker v. Hawkins
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Christopher McCorker
Defendant:
D Hawkins
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
Ralph D. Simmons
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, The and Clerk of the Court, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR. et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
JARED MALACHI HENSON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR., STEVEN JACKSON, LISA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Dunklin County Jail
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Kelly D. Carter
Defendant:
Dunklin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. MEDLIN et al
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. MURPHY
Defendant:
JULIE C. MEDLIN, TRACY ALVORD, BRAD ZIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: LUKE D. LATSON
as 9:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Luke D. Latson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szatanek v. Clinton Superintendent
as 9:2024cv00779
Petitioner:
Steven D. Szatanek
Respondent:
Clinton Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis v. Mullens et al
as 7:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Cecil D. Francis
Defendant:
Doctor Mullens, Medical Staff Jane Doe or John Doe, Jane Doe or John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
