Cases 31 - 40 of 2,116
Hanson v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Michael S. Hanson
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
KELLY v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Petitioner:
MARLIN KELLY
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BEAVER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Middlekauff v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01817
Petitioner:
Darrell Kelly Middlekauff, Sr.
Respondent:
Superintendent Erin Reyes and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Davis
as 6:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
Michael S. Hanson
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00297
Petitioner:
Michael Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
PORTER v. KELLY
as 1:2023cv01094
Petitioner:
WAYNE PORTER
Respondent:
LB KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frank Carr v. Lynn Kelly
as 23-7241
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK CARR
Respondent / Appellee:
LYNN B. KELLY, Warden
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Engel v. Morriss
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Engel
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappell v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi and Unknown Kelly
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
