Cases 41 - 50 of 3,579
Molinares-Nunez v. Garrido
as 4:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Carlos Molinares-Nunez
Respondent:
F.J. Garrido and F J Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mason v. James Allred
as 7:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Preston Smith, Bill Clements, FNU Clemens and others
Respondent:
James Allred and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halterman #289633 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2023cv08615
Petitioner:
Jerad Lee Halterman
Respondent:
Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Garza
as 1:2023cv02057
Petitioner:
Clyde Jones
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nash v. F C I - Talladega
as 5:2023cv01806
Plaintiff:
Paul Nash, Jr
Defendant:
Warden F C I - Talladega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Winkleman v. Hazlewood
as 23-1942
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN F. WINKLEMAN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Diamond (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2023cv03003
Petitioner:
Christopher Diamond
Respondent:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neely v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00752
Petitioner:
Lisa F. Neely
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brewer v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00483
Petitioner:
Renel Anthony Brewer
Respondent:
Victor Regalado, Eric Kitch and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vrancea v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02701
Petitioner:
Ion Catalin Vrancea
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers and Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
