Cases 1 - 10 of 1,015
Moore v. Hodge, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR MOORE
Defendant:
DR. HODGE, (CSP), MARSHALL GRIFFITH, (CSP) and WARDEN LITTLE
McCurtain v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Eric McCurtain
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Maria Nichols, Dr Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasyjanski v. Squirewell et al
as 0:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Harriett Squirewell, Allison Spiars, Deon Artis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Smith v. McFarlin et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Patrick McFarlin, Sheriff Hodges and Q.C.H.C. Medical Company/Entity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ruth Hodges
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, K Newby, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Clay et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Clay and Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
En'Derrell Hawkins
Defendant:
Det Davis, Det Doyle, Det Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. RJD CF Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
David A. Thompson
Defendant:
RJD CF Warden, James S. Hill, L. Schobelock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
