Cases 11 - 20 of 209
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton v. Federal Correctional Institution McDowell et al
as 1:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wade Melton
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Warden, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reed v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Reed
Defendant:
James Shipman, Joe McHoney and Leslie McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. IVICIC et al
as 3:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PERRY
Defendant:
MICHELLE IVICIC, DARREN GINTER, STEVEN BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Donna Davis, Cynthia Conway, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell #509775 v. Enderle
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Artavius Jamal McDowell #509775
Defendant:
Unknown Enderle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Murphy
as 5:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cash McDowell
Defendant:
Trevor Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. McDowell
as 23-30271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael A. James
Defendant / Appellee:
C. McDowell, Sergeant, Dennis Grimes, Sid J. Gautreaux, III and others
Rogers v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Justin David Rogers
Defendant:
McDowell County Commission, Correctional Officer Green and Correctional Officer Culbertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Dekalb County Jail
as 1:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Wardrick McDowell
Defendant:
Dekalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
