Cases 51 - 60 of 942
Murphy v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08484
Plaintiff:
Brendan J Murphy
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxendine v. Moose et al
as 5:2023ct03196
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Oxendine
Defendant:
Timothy D. Moose, Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sowell et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv03532
Plaintiff:
Male Randy Sowell and D.D.S.S.
Defendant:
NYSDOCCS Anthony J. Annucci, NYDC Commissioner Cynthia Brann, PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wormley v. Baeosk et al
as 4:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Bryan O'Neal Wormley
Defendant:
Baeosk and Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Murphy
as 5:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cash McDowell
Defendant:
Trevor Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DALLAL-RAWHI v. FELIX et al
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
FARHA DALLAL-RAWHI and FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA
Defendant:
PAUL A. FELIX, ANJUM AVA, DONALD LEE BUCKINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. ANDREWS
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MURPHY
Defendant:
TRACY ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Alfred Murphy
Defendant:
C.O. Johnson, Gwendolyn Davis, C.O. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. ROCA et al
as 4:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
JAVAR CHARLES MURPHY
Defendant:
C ROCA, BLASSY, D LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
