Cases 91 - 100 of 387
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv07502
Defendant:
John Doe 3, Raymond Gerola, Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SILBAUGH v. NELSON et al
as 1:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
HANNAH SILBAUGH
Defendant:
DAVID SMITH, ANTHONY ATTALLA, MARC NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Abdel-Malak v. Cape Fear Valley Medical Center et al
as 5:2020cv00221
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Cathey et al
as 3:2020cv00406
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin V. Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Angerstien v. Springfield Township et al
as 5:2020cv01333
Defendant:
Summit County, Catherine Phillips, Chief David Hoover and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Angerstien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Clark et al v. Castle et al
as 2:2020cv02417
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-5, Matthew Richmond Davis, Michael Shane Dulaney and others
Plaintiff:
Jaleta Clark, Alorea Hardwick, Ernestine Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHARP v. HOGGSETT et al
as 1:2020cv01584
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #4, WAYNE SHARP and others
Defendant:
JOE HOGSETT and CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Doe #1 et al
as 7:2020cv00124
Defendant:
John Doe Jail Guard #2, John Doe #5, John Doe Deputy Supervisor #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey R. Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Upleggor et al
as 2:2020cv10945
Defendant:
Officer John Does #3, Nurse John Doe #2, Officer John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
