Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lewis v. Freeman et al
as 1:2022cv05820
Plaintiff:
Floyd R. Lewis
Defendant:
Alec D. Freeman, Alexander J. Verta, Steve E. Pulia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
TATEL et al v. MT. LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
CARMILLA TATEL, STACY DUNN and GRETCHEN MELTON
Defendant:
MT. LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT, THE MT. LEBANON SCHOOL BOARD, MEGAN WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv06838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Freeman v. Lenscrafter
as 4:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Felicia D. Freeman
Defendant:
Lenscrafter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Freeman v. Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority
as 1:2013cv00300
Defendant:
Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris et al v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission et al
as 2:2012cv00894
Plaintiff:
Wesley W Harris , LaMont E Andrews , Cynthia L Biggs and others
Defendant:
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, Colleen Mathis, Linda C McNulty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
