Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Church et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
William L.A. Church, Bill Church, Ku Klux Klan and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Directors, Past and Present of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. Unknown Named Special Agent et al
as 3:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robin M. Robinson
Defendant:
Unknown Named Special Agent, Michael Nordwal, US Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robles, et al v. United States, et al
as 22-3017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL M. ROBLES and BONNIE ROBLES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General, State of Kansas and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cantrell v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Harvey Cantrell
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs and Dennis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
