Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Poole v. Pontiac, City of et al
as 4:2023cv11221
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Poole
Defendant:
City of Pontiac, Officer Santiago Serna, Officer Oliver Mathes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clinton Barlow v. United States of America Government
as 22-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON C. BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL JUDGES ASSOCIATION, USAOC GENERAL COUNSEL and others
Sammons v. Wayne County Commission et al
as 3:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Wayne County Board of Education, Wayne County Commission, Todd Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Sammons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pollock v. Knife River Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Knife River Employee, Knife River Supervisor, JTL Group Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Echo M Pollock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Thompson et al
as 2:2019cv02661
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Richard Thompson
Plaintiff:
John Charles Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
BHATT v. CARTMELL et al
as 2:2017cv06183
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
EMILY CARTMELL, CHRISTOPHER GRAMICCIONI, JOHN JAY HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R.N., et al v. Mark Redal, et al
as 17-35638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R.N., individually, J.W., individually and S.C., individually
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK REDAL, individually, MICHAEL J. CROWE, individually, STEVEN C. ENNETT, individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
