Cases 91 - 100 of 3,909
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Piard v. Murphy
as 4:2024cv40005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. United States
as 4:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
James E. Murphy
Defendant:
Ms. White, N.C. English, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
John Doe and State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garner v. State of Arkansas et al
as 5:2024cv05033
Plaintiff:
Charles Dean Garner
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, 15 John or Jane Doe Administrative Employees and Security Officers, 5 John or Jane Doe Human Development Resource Services Administrative Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Sanders et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Elijah Deshawn Robinson
Defendant:
Demarcus Sanders, A. Murphy, Jamal D. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUBENSTEIN v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv05134
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. RUBENSTEIN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC, KAREN MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fred Murphy v. Mike Slagle
as 23-7303
Petitioner:
FRED MURPHY
Respondent:
MIKE SLAGLE, Warden and JOSHUA STEIN
IN RE: Murphy
as 3:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
David Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakouri v. Becker et al
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Shahram Shakouri
Defendant:
Scott Becker, John Rolater, Jennifer Edgeworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
