Cases 11 - 20 of 239
McDonnell v. Fhuere
as 3:2022cv00909
Defendant:
Michael Martin McDonnell
Respondent:
Superintendent Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Stay of Execution
Steven H. Alcaraz v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv09288
Plaintiff:
Steven H. Alcaraz
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Jim McDonnell and MCJ Medical Staff Private Medical Care Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Williams
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Arnaldo Mercado, Scott Sides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13892
Defendant:
EDWARD T. MCDONNELL, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brik v. McDonnell et al
as 4:2020cv01825
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Vladimirovich Brik and Vladimir V. Brik
Defendant:
C. McDonnell, Dr. J. Dunlap and Mr. Nestle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv00849
Defendant:
James Gibson, Christopher Johnson, Dexter L Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulgham v. McDonnell et al
as 2:2020cv00167
Petitioner:
Joe Lee Fulgham
Respondent:
Mark Herring, Robert F. McDonnell and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fulgham v. McDonnell et al
as 7:2020cv00184
Petitioner:
Joe Lee Fulgham
Respondent:
Mark Herring, Robert F. McDonnell and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WILLINGBORO TOWNSHIP NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
LINDA A. HYNES, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, DEPUTY CT. ADMIN. TASHESIA HICKMOND and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster S. Lucas v. Jim McDonnell et al
as 2:2019cv10097
Defendant:
Jim McDonnell, Canfield and Hollis
Plaintiff:
Webster S. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
