Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Correctional Officer C. Via, Correctional Officer P. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merino v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Luis E Merino, Jr.
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation, GTL Financial Services, Via Path Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guiovanni v. Jonsen et al
as 3:2023cv03815
Plaintiff:
Topete Guiovanni
Defendant:
Bob Jonsen, Telcom Communications, Global Tel Link and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Via, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6732
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA-DOC
FRYE v. DENNIS et al
as 2:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER FRYE
Defendant:
DAVID DENNIS and VIA PATH TECHNOLOGIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Via v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Robert King Via, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, K. Crosby, Beth Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLOBAL*TEL LINK aka VIA PATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Via v. Reedy
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Adam Via
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Reedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Garriga et al
as 1:2022cv06041
Defendant:
Michelle Garriga, Suzan Garriga, Dr Vias and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl King, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
