Cases 31 - 40 of 66,593
Keeter v. Waddell et al
as 7:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jackie Russell Keeter
Defendant:
Michael Waddell, Nickey Vazquez, Seth Lippert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrow v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1239
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Garcia v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, C.S.P.D. Officer and others
Ray v. State of Florida (Lee)
as 2:2024cv00525
Petitioner:
Clifton Michael Ray
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Frazee et al
as 5:2024cv11465
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Coleman
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Frazee, Jessica R. Cooper, Phyllis McMillen and others
Higgins v. TDCJ Wainwright Unit
as 7:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michael Higgins
Defendant:
TDCJ Wainwright Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deblasio v. The United States of America
as 4:2024cv02175
Petitioner:
Michael Deblasio
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Darling v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Michael Darling
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NAPPER v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
TYWAN NAPPER
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Salsman v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Chad Michael Salsman
Respondent:
Superintendent Melinda Adams, Michelle A. Henry, Esquire and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
