Cases 41 - 50 of 786
Hollingsworth v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Mark Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Jeffrey Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shivers Jr. v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01598
Plaintiff:
Dwight L. Shivers Jr.
Defendant:
Natasha L. Hollingsworth, Lt. Heisman, Lt. Kevin S. Lorick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Evans et al
as 3:2021cv00729
Plaintiff:
Zitavion Daytrun Rush
Defendant:
Thelma Evans, Chris Hollingsworth, Alex Unknown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Delaware Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01203
Plaintiff:
Qudree Shakur Warren
Defendant:
Delaware Dept. of Corrections, Natasha L. Hollingsworth, Casey J. Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollingsworth v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08168
Petitioner:
Curtis Benjamin Hollingsworth
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Warden May et al
as 1:2021cv00708
Defendant:
Warden May, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis, Captain Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Tye Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Cargile et al
as 4:2021cv00426
Defendant:
Cargile, Barry A Sims, Beth C Kremers and others
Plaintiff:
Larry David Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLINGSWORTH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2021cv00205
Defendant:
MIKE RAINS d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Deputy Warden, TODD ROKITA d/b/a, Indiana Attorney General, ERIC HOLCOMB d/b/a, Governor and others
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
