Cases 51 - 60 of 80,797
Pareja v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Roberto Alonso Ruiz Pareja
Defendant:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cornelius Carolina v. Robert Miller
as 24-1974
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS CAROLINA
Respondent:
ROBERT MILLER, Warden
Marica Pennington v. Eliseo Ricolcol
as 5:2024cv01183
Petitioner:
Marcia Pennington
Respondent:
Warden Eliseo Ricolcol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stickney v. Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Brian Thomas Stickney
Respondent:
Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dunlap v. Warden FMC Devens
as 1:2024cv11462
Petitioner:
Cortney Dunlap
Respondent:
Warden FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rath v. Wingfield et al
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Emil Roland Rath, II
Defendant:
Warden Barry Wingfield and FCC Yazoo City Low-I
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AL-BAYYINAH v. JAMES
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
JATHIYAH A. AL-BAYYINAH
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMEL JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Whirlwind Horse v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04105
Petitioner:
Michael R. Whirlwind Horse, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Alex Reyes and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
