Cases 51 - 60 of 321
IN RE: JOHNSON
as 2:2022cv03402
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of South Carolina
as 1:2022cv00169
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. MARLBORO COUNTY, SC
as 1:2022cv00698
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARLBORO COUNTY, SC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Marlboro County
as 4:2022cv02774
Plaintiff:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Marlboro County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2022hc02148
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JOHNSON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE L JOHNSON, JR and FRANKIE LEE JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., MARTZ and REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01191
Plaintiff:
Rafeal Deshawn Newson and Marquis Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Gayle Cochran, Cindy J Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Parks et al
as 3:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lee Johnson, II
Defendant:
Capt. Parks, Deputy Bull, Deputy Talalemotu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dunham et al
as 4:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Kenny Dunham, Nancy Lawrance and Crystal Stripland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Johnson
as 22-40305
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Devante Lee Johnson, also known as Bonty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
