Cases 81 - 90 of 767
McHam v. Does
as 4:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Haley McHam
Defendant:
Does Officers, Yell County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. Does
as 4:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Shyda Stine
Defendant:
Does Officers, Yell County Jail, Does Officers, Guard Haley, Guard Andrew, Yell County Jail and Elkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shine-Johnson et al v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03236
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Shine-Johnson and Richard Stanton Whitman
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Marc Bratton, Eddy Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Currie et al
as 1:2022cv11321
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Haley Currie, Dennis P McManus, Robert J. Creedon, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. KUHN et al
as 1:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
LARRY KUHN, VICTOR GUARISCO, HALEY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fraley v. Haley
as 5:2022ct03243
Plaintiff:
Shawn Germaine Fraley
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Haley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Akers
as 5:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dewayne Haley
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haley v. Brewer
as 22-60398
Petitioner / Appellant:
Russell Haley
Respondent / Appellee:
Franklin Brewer
Shouse v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jacob Allan Shouse
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Denise Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghanbari Trevino v. Viramontes et al
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ali Louis Vaysi Ghanbari Trevino
Defendant:
FNU Viramontes, John Doe #1 1:22-cv-101, John Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
