Cases 81 - 90 of 2,537
Lance Braham v. Camacho et al
as 1:2023cv24146
Plaintiff:
Lance Braham
Defendant:
W. Gonzalez Camacho, John Doe, Warden Boan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Edward Lane Hart
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane-Bey v. Lane T98017 et al
as 1:2023cv12391
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lane-Bey
Defendant:
Alfred Darnell Lane T98017, Maura T. Healy, Shawn P. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUBBERT v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01818
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. HUBBERT
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER LANE, JUSTIN ARNHOLT, STILLABOWER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Lane et al
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, Norton, S Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne #649938 v. Dobe et al
as 1:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Ryan Osborne #649938
Defendant:
Unknown Dobe, T. Page, Unknown Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramsey v. Lane et al
as 2:2023cv02174
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Ramsey
Defendant:
A. Lane, C. MaHenski, A. Yderraga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. DILDINE
as 1:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE ADAMS
Defendant:
LANE DILDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Matlock et al
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ryan Parker
Defendant:
Micheal Matlock, Flossey Lane, Joseph McCorkly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
