Cases 81 - 90 of 1,131
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Ragan #314744 v. Wellpath et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ragan #314744
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical Provider, Sarah Riley, Michael Travis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02212
Plaintiff:
Tyler Harris
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, WellPath, LLC, Carolyn Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alphonso Bell v. Moore
as 24-6408
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO BELL, SR.
Defendant:
MOORE, Deputy, HIRST, Lt. Sheriff, DOLAN, Nurse, Wellpath and others
Lumpkin v. Wellpath
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Lumpkin, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CASTRO and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helper v. Joanna et al
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Richard C Helper
Defendant:
Nurse Joanna, Dr Brown, Wellpath Medical Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 6:2024cv06023
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Dr Guy Henry and Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Williams v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-1455
Plaintiff:
Henry Williams
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, Gary Musselwhite, Warden, Cummins Unit, Robert L. Pierce, Security Deputy Warden, Cummins Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
