Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Ainooson v. O'Gara et al
as 1:2023cv11478
Plaintiff:
Justice E. Ainooson
Defendant:
James O'Gara, Sheila C Kelly, Joann Lynds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Williams v. Warden Kelly
as 23-6416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN KELLY, JAMES SAVGE, DOC DEEZIEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Abdullah #40697 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Seymour Jameel Abdullah
Respondent:
David Shinn, Charles Ryan, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Warden Kelly, James Savge, Doc Deezien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kelly v. Lewis et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Officer Freeman, Officer Morgan, Sgt. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Javonta C. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2019cv01634
Defendant:
Tom Wolfe, Morgan C. David, A. Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdullah #40697 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00219
Defendant:
Virginia C Kelly, Charles L Ryan, Mark Brnovich and others
Plaintiff:
Seymour J Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brennan et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Kyle L. Brennan , Patrick D. Church and Brian L. Iles
Defendant:
Emma C. Kelly , Charles Kelly , Mary Ann Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archuleta v. Smith et al
as 2:2018cv00643
Plaintiff:
Samuel Archuleta
Defendant:
A. Smith, Gonzales, C. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
