Cases 1 - 10 of 38
David Little, Jr. v. John Palmer
as 24-6516
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, T. ROBERTSON, Assistant Warden and others
Ross v. Pike, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, Administrator at Somerset County Jail, D. GRAY, JAQUES, Sargent at Somerset County Jail and others
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GRAY and LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSS v. PIKE et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, D GRAY, JAQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02779
Petitioner:
Davon D. Gray
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Dai Nguyen
Defendant:
K. Williams, D. Zepeda, D. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. LOVETTE
as 1:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
DQUAN D. GRAY
Defendant:
WARDEN LOVETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
STARKES JR. v. WARDEN MCCATHY et al
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
HOWARD STARKES JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN MCCATHY, T. RIVERA, D. GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Henderson Police Department et al.
as 6:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Terry D Gray, Sr
Respondent:
Henderson Police Department, Lt. Brian Graham and K. Handy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Henderson Police Department et al. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 4:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Terry D Gray, Sr
Defendant:
Henderson Police Department, Lt. Brian Graham and K. Handy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
