Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Overman v. Steedley
as 4:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Scott Richard Overman
Respondent:
Warden William Steedley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OVERMAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
WAYNE SPRY OVERMAN, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lacey v. Overman
as 8:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Terrance Adrian Lacey
Defendant:
Mark Overman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Jackson-Mackay v. Vonnie Cotant, et al
as 22-2230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David A. Jackson-Mackay
Plaintiff:
Austin D. Anderson and Preston Wisenbaker
Defendant / Appellee:
Vonnie Cotant, Jail Administrator, Scotts Bluff County Detention Center, Michael Dedinsky, Deputy Jail Administrator, Scotts Bluff County Detention Center, Julie White, Administrative Sergeant, Scotts Bluff County Detention Center and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10
Stanko v. Sheridan County et al
as 8:2020cv00294
Defendant:
Mark Overman, Aaron Conn, Sheridan County and others
Plaintiff:
Rudy Stanko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Churray et al
as 4:2020cv00244
Defendant:
L Harris, Nfn Early, Kathy Wyant and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv00296
Plaintiff:
James Spann, John Saulsberry, Roy Rodgers and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Lee Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overman v. Wang et al
as 1:2017cv01465
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Overman
Defendant:
Lawrence Wang and Mark Ammonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacy v. Rice et al
as 4:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Stacy
Defendant:
Matt Rice, Does, Monte Munyan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stricklin v. Overman et al
as 4:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen Stricklin
Defendant:
Overman and Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
