Cases 91 - 100 of 3,968
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Heath Zachary v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 23-3119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATH ZACHARY
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wetmore et al v. Brassfield et al
as 4:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wetmore and Victory Strategies, LLC
Defendant:
Adam Heath Brassfield, Veronica Brassfield, Adam Brassfield, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wetmore et al v. Brassfield et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wetmore and Victory Strategies, LLC
Defendant:
Adam Heath Brassfield, Veronica Brassfield, Adam Brassfield, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jarrow v. Orr
as 23-11195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Jarrow
Defendant / Appellee:
Heath H Orr, Lieutenant of Correctional Officers
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS T. HEATH
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Biggers v. The State of Texas
as 23-7784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENESHA BIGGERS
Plaintiff:
M.F., A minor and Z.S., A minor
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF TEXAS, NEW YORK ACS, EL PASO CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
