Cases 91 - 100 of 65,338
Henry v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Henry
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Watson et al
as 4:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Det. Unknown Watson, Arnold Police Dept. and Jefferson County Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PYLES v. HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06414
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE PYLES
Defendant:
HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC., THE HOME DEPOT USA INC., HOME DEPOT STORE #0919 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adams v. Robertson et al
as 4:2024cv05053
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
PhD Caitlin Robertson and Sarah Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Reed
as 24-30329
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Defendant:
P. Reed, Captain, Joseph Westbrook, Master Sergeant, Unknown Scott, Sergeant and others
Honorable Order of KY Colonels, Inc. v. Kentucky Colonels Intl, et al
as 24-5511
Plaintiff:
HONORABLE ORDER OF KENTUCKY COLONELS, INC.
Defendant:
KENTUCKY COLONELS INTERNATIONAL, GLOBCAL INTERNATIONAL, ECOLOGY CROSSROADS COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Bender v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. FCI Coleman Low Warden, et al
as 24-11694
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
FCI COLEMAN LOW WARDEN, JOHN DOE, Assistant Warden, Coleman Low, Inmate Affairs and Operations, JANE DOE, Assistant Warden, Coleman Low, Inmate Affairs and Operations and others
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01482
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
