Cases 151 - 160 of 731
ROUNDTREE v. SANTIAGO et al
as 1:2020cv20744
Defendant:
OFC. STADE, OFC. CRANEY, OFC. MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Fleming et al
as 2:2020cv00638
Defendant:
Ms. Harris, Intel Officer M. Perry, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jeffrey Roundtree
as 20-3444
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY ROUNDTREE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ROUNDTREE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv03205
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ROUNDTREE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Roundtree v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv07453
Defendant:
John Doe(s), City of Chicago, Anita Alvarez and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Lashawn Roundtree, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUNDTREE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv17945
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY ROUNDTREE, JR. and THE ESTATE OF JUANTA ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roundtree v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG3)
as 1:2020cv00326
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Danielle P. Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roundtree v. Lopez et al
as 1:2020cv00239
Defendant:
Nathan Rangel, Leeroy Cano, Alan Merchant and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Roundtree and Terrence A Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Richmond County et al
as 1:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Richmond County, Does 1 - 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lila Roundtree v. Melissa Lloyd et al
as 2:2020cv10082
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 10, inclusive and Melissa Lloyd
Plaintiff:
Lila Roundtree
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
