Cases 11 - 20 of 1,981
Bonner v. Collier
as 24-50229
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director of Texas Parole Board, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 24-40307
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Botero v. The Grove Hauling et al
as 4:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Laura Botero
Defendant:
The Grove Hauling and Larry Gene Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bonner v. Economic Improvement Council, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonner
Defendant:
Economic Improvement Council, Inc., Landon Mason Sr. and Vanessa Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Dawn Keefer, et al v. President United States of America, et al
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
DAWN KEEFER and TIMOTHY BONNER
Defendant:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
