Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Ramirez v. Cuestas
as 4:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Gregory C Ramirez
Defendant:
Unknown Cuestas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02509
Plaintiff:
JESSE C RAMIREZ JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudnall v. Smith
as 21-50783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert K. Hudnall and Sharon Elias Hudnall
Defendant / Appellee:
Ty Smith, Individually and as agent for Smith and Ramirez Restoration LLC, Alejandro C. Ramirez, Individually and agent for Smith and Ramirez Restoration L.L.C., Kurt G. Paxson, Individually and agent for Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi, Paxson and Galatzan and others
Hudnall et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Sharon Elias Hudnall and Robert K. Hudnall
Defendant:
Kurt G. Paxson, Guy Bluff, Evanston Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAMIREZ v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02738
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MARIA C RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Ramirez-Ramos
as 21-8006
Respondent:
JUAN C. RAMIREZ-RAMOS
Interested Party:
PR SUPREME COURT
Erpel v. U.S. Freedom Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03935
Defendant:
Emily Tobolowsky, Allen Landerman PC, Dale Tillery and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Erpel and Eric Drake
Petitioner:
Caroline Meredith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Alma Ramirez
as 20-2365
Defendant / Appellant:
ALMA C. RAMIREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv04359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
