Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Henderson et al v. School District of Springfield R-12 et al
as 6:2021cv03219
Plaintiff:
Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant:
School District of Springfield R-12, Board of Education of the School District of Springfield R-12, Grenita Lathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Gwendolyn Babers, Alan Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers et al v. Myers et al
as 2:2020cv00620
Plaintiff:
Richard Garrett, Jamark Flanning, Kereen J Reed and others
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Warden Stout and Rodney Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Fonseca
as 19-1791
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE ANDERSON FONSECA, f/k/a Lawrence Anderson Fonseca-Garcia
Anderson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 0:2018cv02662
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Joan Anderson and Lawrence Anderson
US v. Anderson Fonseca
as 17-1532
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE ANDERSON FONSECA, a/k/a Lawrence Anderson-Fonseca
Lawrence Anderson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00184
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley et al v. Fenton et al
as 1:2015cv11555
Plaintiff:
Kelli Dudley
Defendant:
Ernest Fenton, Law Office of Ernest B. Fenton, P.C., William Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anderson v. Baggett et al
as 5:2015cv02244
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anderson
Defendant:
Angie Baggett and Michael Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00858
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lawrence Anderson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
