Cases 11 - 20 of 100
NADEEM v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv00999
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD NADEEM
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451 (j) Motion to Correct Order & Judg. of Naturalization
Masood v. USA
as 0:2026cv03317
Petitioner:
Muhammad Masood
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Muhammad v. Dowell et al
as 1:2026cv08226
Plaintiff:
James E Muhammad
Defendant:
Pat Dowell, City of Chicago and Unknown Third Ward Employess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Muhammad v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02086
Plaintiff:
Ameer Muhammad
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Walmart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hashim Muhammad v. Riverside County Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2026cv03797
Plaintiff:
Hashim Muhammad
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriffs Office, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Deputy Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breeze Smoke LLC v. Sheikh et al
as 1:2026cv07906
Plaintiff:
Breeze Smoke LLC
Defendant:
Saaed Sheikh, Glass Master LLC, Khadam Hussain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Winegar, et al. v. Howard, et al.
as 4:2026cv00419
Plaintiff:
Tyler Winegar and Steve Winegar
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
