Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,663
CHISHTI v. AFINITI, INC.
as 1:2024cv01723
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD ZIAULLAH KHAN CHISHTI
Defendant: AFINITI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Moralez v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv03569
Plaintiff: Rudolph Moralez
Defendant: State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: JAMES SERFASS
Defendant: CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01695
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Basharat v. Kraus Restoration Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04150
Plaintiff: Muhammad Basharat
Defendant: Kraus Restoration Inc., Kraus Maintenance Inc., Stephen Kraus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
MUHAMMAD v. ARMFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv02553
Petitioner: WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Respondent: JAMES ARMFIELD, AL MILES, WILBUR JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03479
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Muhammad v. Mason et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Petitioner: Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Respondent: Bernadette Mason and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Erick Hobbs
as 24-1529
Petitioner: In re: ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS, a/k/a Eric Muhammad
Muhammad v. J. Herrera et al
as 4:2024cv02160
Plaintiff: Kendrick Muhammad
Defendant: J. Herrera and D.O. Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?