Cases 11 - 20 of 2,310
(PC) Ainsworth v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2024cv01478
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
S. Shepherd, Blanche, Riedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCowan (PS) v. McCowan et al
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Sarah McCowan
Defendant:
Horace McCowan, Lisa Grace McCowan Foley, Freed & Shepherd PC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. Whilby et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
P. Whilby, G. Shepherd and Clint Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01802
Plaintiff:
Darrell Shepherd
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
SHEPHERD-OSCAR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv04689
Plaintiff:
DENISE SHEPHERD-OSCAR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO NA INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Avery v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Shenita Avery
Defendant:
Tyler Thompson, Liz J. Shepherd and Jack Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shepherd v. Philpot et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Lydia Shepherd
Defendant:
Tabitha Philpot and Sabrina Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Pickett, Jr., et al v. City of Cleveland, OH
as 24-3395
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
COOKE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA COOKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRENT MILLER, CHIEF DEPUTY BRADLEY SHEPHERD, JAIL COMMANDER BRADLEY SEACAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
