Cases 21 - 30 of 2,815
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson, Timothy L. Johnson and Timothy Leverne Johnson
Defendant:
Glenn Woods, Rhett Holden, Rodney A. Bostick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Philpott v. City of Stow et al.
as 5:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Michael Philpott
Defendant:
City of Stow, Stephan W. Miller, Samantha R. Wike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
United States of America v. Johnson
as 24-753
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAMIEAN L. JOHNSON
Johnson v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 1:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Taylor L. Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp and Truist Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmett Brock et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 8:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
EMMETT BROCK
Petitioner:
SGT RAYMOND MUNOZ, SGT JEREMIAH FLETCHER and CMDR ALLEN CASTELLANO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JOSEPH BENZA III, CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bobby JohnsonIn re: Bobby Johnson
as 24-10781
Petitioner:
In re: BOBBY L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
