Cases 21 - 30 of 116
WELTY v. KULT, et al
as 2:2020cv00810
Defendant:
KULT, CHUCKY, UNIT MANAGER MISS TINA M. RENNER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOOD v. USA
as 1:2020cv00475
Petitioner:
CHUCKIE DALE WOOD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
YABUT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26259
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHUCKIE YABUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Barcelo-Severino
as 19-2219
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
RUBEN BARCELO-SEVERINO, a/k/a Chucky
WOOD v. USA
as 1:2019cv01190
Petitioner:
CHUCKIE DALE WOOD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Farkas v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13179
Plaintiff:
Chucky Paul Farkas
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
United States of America v. Allie(Hill)
as 19-2694
Defendant / Appellant:
Raymond Hill, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Pops
Defendant:
Luis Guzman, Haranakk Dingle, AKA Sealed Defendant 15, AKA Pookie, Andre Cunningham, AKA Sealed Defendant 14, AKA Drizz and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
NANCE et al v. CITY OF ALBEMARLE, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2019cv00641
Plaintiff:
MRS. JENNIFER R. NANCE and MR. CHUCKY L. NANCE
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBEMARLE, NORTH CAROLINA, MAYOR RONNIE MICHAEL, DIRECTOR KEVIN ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Phillip Olmstead v. Fentress County Tennessee, et al
as 19-5447
Defendant / Appellee:
LANCE MAYNARD, Correctional Officer, CHARLES CRAVENS, aka Chucky Cravens, TAMMY KING, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP DAVID OLMSTEAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
