Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Wright v. Biomet Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00345
Plaintiff:
Randy Wright
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhommad v. Hempstead County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2014cv04032
Defendant:
Hempstead County, Arkansas, James Singleton, Johnny Godbolt and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhommad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Young et al
as 5:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Smith
Defendant:
Beverly Young, Tony Caldwell, James Boykin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv31188
Plaintiff:
Donna L. Wright and Randy Wright
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Tigner et al
as 3:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
Randy Wright
Defendant:
Billy Tigner, Courtney Whitehead, Diffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. CEQUENT CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
RANDY WRIGHT
Defendant:
CEQUENT CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wiseman v. Yoken et al
as 4:2009cv04003
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Wiseman
Defendant:
Tony Yoken, Danny P Rodgers, Anthony Biddle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wiseman v. Yoken et al
as 4:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Wiseman
Defendant:
Tony Yoken, Danny P Rodgers, Anthony Biddle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bernard Jones v. Capt. Louise Phillips, et al
as 08-1708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bernard Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Captain Louise Phillips, Jail Administrator, Judge Duncan Culpepper, Chris Thomason, Prosecutor and others
GLISSON et al v. STRITTMATTER et al
as 1:2007cv01066
Plaintiff:
OLIVER GLISSON, OLIVER GLISSON, OLIVER GLISSON and others
Defendant:
MATT STRITTMATTER, RANDY WRIGHT, DAVE SHAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
