Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Byrd v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2015cv04518
Petitioner:
James Robert Byrd
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brimlett v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Company et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
Alfred Brimlett
Defendant:
Nucor-Yamato Steel Company , Nucor Sheet Metal Group , Nucor Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Byrd v. Dart
as 1:2014cv06256
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. WY Department of Corrections, et al
as 14-8033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT OWEN MARSHALL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC./CORIZON HEALTH, ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, individually and inis official capacity and others
Hollingsworth v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Richard Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Kim T. Thomas, Gary Hetzel, Ronzella Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as WVS/2:13-cv-13979
Plaintiff:
Patsy Byrd and Robert Byrd
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Byrd et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2013cv13979
Plaintiff:
Patsy Byrd and Robert Byrd
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gadekan v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2012cv03208
Defendant:
1-100 Unknown USDA Officials, 1-100 non-USDA employees, Beverly Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Gadekan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
