Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Gregory Randolph v. Powercomm Construction, Inc.
as 16-2370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY RANDOLPH, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DANA BROWN, TWANDA BANISTER and others
Plaintiff:
VAN EUBANKS, DAVID PETERSON, JACQUELINE RIDLEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
POWERCOMM CONSTRUCTION, INC. and DAVID KWASNIK, SR.
YOUNG v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07531
Plaintiff:
RONALD YOUNG
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. DePuy Orthopedics Inc et al
as 1:2016dp20074
Plaintiff:
Linda Young and Ronald Young
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopedics Inc , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv03881
Plaintiff:
Karen Young and Ronald Young
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. State of Iowa
as 6:2015cv02031
Plaintiff:
Ronald Young
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ronald Young v. Sisodia et al
as 1:2015cv00640
Plaintiff:
Ronald Young
Defendant:
C. Sisodia and J. Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estella Butler v. Elsinore Valley Municipal Wate, et al
as 14-55522
Plaintiff:
ESTELLA BUTLER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHIL FIKES
Defendant - Appellee:
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RONALD YOUNG and WATER EMPLOYEE SERVICES AUTHORITY
Young v. Amerigas Propane, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
Ronald Young
Defendant:
Amerigas Propane, Inc. and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. INDIANAPOLIS NEUROSURGICAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2006cv01778
Plaintiff:
MELANIE ANDERSON, TOM HERRON, STATE OF INDIANA and others
317) 636-7505 (fax:
Thomas A. John, Thomas A. John, Thomas A. John and others
Defendant:
MARK BRYNIARSKI, M.D., MICHAEL BURT, M.D., PATRICK CONNOLLY, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
