Cases 21 - 30 of 117
CONNORS v. BOROUGH OF RIVERDALE et al
as 2:2019cv18551
Plaintiff:
SEAN W. CONNORS
Defendant:
RIVERDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER, BOROUGH OF RIVERDALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATES et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03217
Plaintiff:
CARL BOURGEOIS, MAURICE BOVEAR, KENNETH BOROM and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bates et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02180
Plaintiff:
Carl Bourgeois, Maurice Bovear, Kenneth Borom and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Moran et al v. Lenahan et al
as 1:2019cv00808
Defendant:
Charles Lenahan, Kelly Ripa, Victor P. DeAmelic and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Love, Thomas J. Moran, Joan C. Finn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quigley #934431 v. Trewiler et al
as 1:2019cv00480
Defendant:
J. Buchin, Tony Trewiler, J. Davids and others
Plaintiff:
Sean W. Quigley #934431
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Slatery et al
as 3:2019cv00496
Plaintiff:
Sean W. Lee
Defendant:
Mark Gwyn and Herbert H. Slatery, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nestor Loera Arellano v. William Barr
as 19-1574
Defendant / Appellee:
J. D. THORPE, Atlanta Field Office Director for the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SDDO VERONDA, ATD Supervisor United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NESTOR VICENTE LOERA ARELLANO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00068
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
