Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,500
Randle v. Avina
as 24-10286
Plaintiff: Brianna Randle and Sywayne Burgess
Defendant: Cindy Avina, Individually and in her professional capacity
Burgess v. Grace et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff: Kren/Karen Y Burgess
Defendant: Mr. Grace, Ms. Murry, Mr. August and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 357 et al v. REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 357 and ELIJAH BURGESS
Defendant: REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff: KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant: JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
BURGESS v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04199
Defendant: LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff: DAPHINE BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent: Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Lee et al v. 3M Company Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00362
Plaintiff: Stephanie Lee, Joseph "Scott&quo Owens, James Burgess and others
Defendant: 3M Company Inc, Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc and Daikin America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
USA v. Edward Burgess
as 24-1497
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: EDWARD BURGESS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?