Cases 31 - 40 of 122
MILES v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
RODERICK L. MILES
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blackmon v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr
Defendant:
Mick Hale, Brandon Kent Falls, A C Roper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles (ID 67725) v. Conover
as 5:2017cv03197
Petitioner:
Maurice L. Miles, Jr.
Respondent:
Emmalee Conover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miles v. Raytown Quality Schools et al
as 4:2017cv00919
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Miles
Defendant:
Raytown Quality Schools, Jason Vaughan, James Morrial and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Miles v. Smith County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L Miles
Defendant:
Smith County Sheriff's Department, 241st District Court and Smith County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Miles v. KY Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 17-5848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL L. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LADONNA H. THOMPSON, Commissioner, DON BOTTOM, Warden and others
Miles v. Conrad, et al
as 17-3100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE L. MILES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
(FNU) CONRAD, Deputy, Reno County Sheriff's Department, in his official capacity, (FNU) SWONGER, Deputy, Reno County Sheriff's Department, in his official capacity, (FNU) MONDRAGON, Deputy, Reno County Sheriff's Department, in his official capacity and others
Miles v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02606
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Miles
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Christy Smith Car Insurance et al
as 5:2017cv02346
Plaintiff:
Tajiia Ramone Hardy
Defendant:
Christy Smith Car Insurance, Raleigh General Hospital, Sheriff of Raleigh County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
