Cases 31 - 40 of 207
WRIGHT v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WRIGHT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Wright v. Contra Costa Country, et al
as 22-15719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
CONTRA COSTA COUNTRY, DEVON BELL and MARK PETTERSON
Wright v. Contra Costa Country et al
as 4:2022cv01896
Plaintiff:
Michael Wright
Defendant:
Contra Costa Country, Devon Bell and Mark Petterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Willis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, County of Multnomah, City of Portland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michael Wright
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark et al v. Haaland et al
as 1:2021cv01091
Plaintiff:
Guy Clark, Linda Corwin, Craig Corwin and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Camille C Touton, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. Kortbawi
as 21-679
Defendant:
Equan Latham, Casius Ernest, AKA Ernest Casius and Michael Wright
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Kortbawi, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
Wright v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2021cv00945
Plaintiff:
Michael Wright
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, SAPD, Jonathan Tatlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
