Cases 31 - 40 of 76
ARMSTRONG v. SECRETARY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, R HODGE and DEAN PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louthian v. Nationwide General Insurance Company et al
as 3:2016cv03554
Plaintiff:
Herbert W. Louthian, Jr.
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company and Gary R. Hodge Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HODGE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06209
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE R. HODGE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01310
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah R. Hodge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hodge v. Blount County et al (PLR2)
as 3:2016cv00317
Plaintiff:
Judy R Hodge
Defendant:
Blount County, James L Berrong, Henry Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv02289
Plaintiff:
Franklin R Hodges
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodges v. Royal Express, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv04076
Plaintiff:
James R. Hodges
Defendant:
Royal Express, Inc. and Juan Precente-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodges v. Herrington et al
as 4:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Hamilton R. Hodges, Jr.
Defendant:
Ron Herrington and Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge et al v. Misenheimer et al
as 1:2015cv00984
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Hodge and Deborah L. Hodge
Defendant:
William A. Misenheimer and Advance Stores Company Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PATRICK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01687
Plaintiff:
TAMBU PATRICK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RONALD MACHEN, TONY COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
