Cases 41 - 50 of 219
Williams v. Saul
as 7:2020cv00407
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Dorthy Rose Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Whitt v. Thornton et al
as 4:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Dr Jones, William Harold, Mike Pitts and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Kenneth Whitt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00250
Plaintiff:
Roy Cantu
Defendant:
Alderman, Leon, Harvil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Brown v. Russell et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Ms Dorthy
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Delk v. Hardeman County Correctional, et al
as 19-6387
Defendant / Appellee:
KEINAENNA JACKSON, a Disciplinary Sergeant at HCCF, LATOYA LOUDEN, HCCF Corrections Officer (C/O), DORTHY ROBERTSON, a Unit Manager at HCCF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN DELK
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC v. Town of Weymouth
as 1:2019cv12338
Defendant:
Priya Howell, Frank Singleton, Patrick O'Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Chad Ryan Kroll v. Dorthy Shubin et al
as 2:2019cv09006
Defendant:
Marc Debbaudt, Thomas Lee and Dorthy Shubin
Plaintiff:
Chad Ryan Kroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Heirs and Devisees of Dorothy A Fidnarik, et al
as 2:2019cv00380
Defendant:
HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF DORTHY A. FIDNARIK, DECEASED; and TIFFANY DERR-DIAZ, Heirs and Devisees of Dorothy A Fidnarik and Tiffany Derr-Diaz
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Murrell v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05039
Defendant:
Centurion of Arizona LLC, Unknown Ryan, Charles L Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Antony T Murrell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
