Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Wren v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Michael Wren
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Robert Ratton, III, Harold Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Internal Revenue Service v. King
as 1:2018cv00962
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin King
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
King v. Indy Mac Bank FSB et al
as 2:2018cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kevin King
Defendant:
Indy Mac Bank FSB, Pacific Reverse Mortgage, Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Perry v. Town of East Greenwich
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
William Perry , Daniel Andrade , Seth Archambault and others
Defendant:
Town of East Greenwich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00881
Petitioner:
Kevin King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wren v. Erwin et al
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Michael Wren
Defendant:
Harold Erwin, Rob Ratton, Henry H Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldrich-Kaut et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2017cv09323
Plaintiff:
Ashton Aldrich-Kaut , Tiara Alexander , Rita Aye and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burch v. Roofers Local No. 20 Health and Welfare Fund et al
as 4:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E Burch
Defendant:
Roofers Local No. 20 Health and Welfare Fund , Kevin King , Charles T Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
King v. CHL, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03691
Plaintiff:
Kevin King
Defendant:
CHL, Inc. and Hoa K Tran
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones et al v. City of Spokane et al
as 2:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Danny Cecil Jones , Nancy Jones , Alyssa Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Spokane , Frank Straub, Kevin King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
