Cases 41 - 50 of 27,242
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Kelli Wise, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Nettisia Mitchell
as 24-11589
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NETTISIA MITCHELL
Mitchell v. Stateville NRC
as 3:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willis Mitchell
Defendant:
Stateville NRC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Eldon Mitchell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Merrill v. McKinney Independent School District et al
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Kalei Merrill
Defendant:
Mitchell Curry, Melinda Defelice, Tamaria Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Henderson v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
William Sherrod Henderson
Defendant:
Michelle B. Mitchell, Gary Sink, Carolyn Gready and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation-False Arrest
Matthews v. Leflore County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Kevin Matthews
Defendant:
Leflore County, Mississippi, Leflore County Board of Supervisors, Johnny Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Christon Mitchell
Defendant:
Craig Washington, LaPointe, A. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chavez v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Chavez
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre, Mitchell Knedler, Darrow Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. WEST et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
BRANDYN MITCHELL
Defendant:
J WEST and M NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
