Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Sandoval v. Raemisch, et al
as 17-1161
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM FRANK SANDOVAL
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, MICHAEL MILLER, Warden, Crowley Correctional Facility and CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN, Attorney General, State of Colorado
William Miller v. Sevier County Jail, et al
as 17-5391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM FRANK MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
SEVIER COUNTY JAIL and QUALITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE
Sandoval v. Raemisch
as 1:2016cv01406
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch and Michael Miller
Petitioner:
William Frank Sandoval
Defendant:
Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Sevier County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
William Frank Miller
Defendant:
Sevier County Jail and Quality Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quattrocchi et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13040
Plaintiff:
Peggy Quattrocchi and William Frank Quattrocchi
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLMES et al v. SKILETZ et al
as 5:2015cv03906
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HOLMES , JR. and DAVID SANTEE
Defendant:
WILLIAM FRANK SKILETZ, IV , JOSHUA DAVID BRUBAKER , KEVIN BIROSIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. William Huffman
as 15-10643
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM FRANK HUFFMAN
Shari Beneda et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02504
Plaintiff:
Shari Beneda , John Beneda , Doris Cater and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Shari Beneda et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04267
Plaintiff:
John Beneda, Shari Beneda, Doris Cater and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Juchartz #439574 v. Phillips et al
as 1:2014cv00971
Plaintiff:
William Frank Juchartz #439574
Defendant:
S. Phillips and E. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
