Cases 51 - 60 of 153
Michael Hernandez v. B. Johnson
as 21-1761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL E. HERNANDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
B. JOHNSON, SERGEANT GARDNER, FELIX TAYLOR and others
Kruse v. Elk River, City of, The et al
as 0:2021cv01262
Defendant:
Police Officer Evan Patullo, Police Officer Dale Olmscheid, Defendant Employee Samuel Hines and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff/Trustee Kelsey Ann Kruse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacques v. Hill et al
as 1:2021cv21648
Defendant:
Espino, Guttini, Officer Girobey and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
BOTTOM v. CITY OF SALISBURY et al
as 1:2021cv00322
Defendant:
DEPUTY MARK BENFIELD, OFFICER DEVIN BARKALOW, OFFICER ADAM BOUK and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE BOTTOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITING v. SERGEANT LIBERTY et al
as 1:2021cv08282
Defendant:
OFFICER REED, OFFICER XAYAPHACHAN, OFFICER TRAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADELBERT A. WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLendon v. Teodoro et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00264
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center, Officer Barner, Officer Ellington and others
Plaintiff:
Drew Barry McLendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn Thomas v. City of Fontana et al
as 5:2021cv00452
Defendant:
OFFICER JOSHUA PATTY, OFFICER JUSTIN LAING, OFFICER JOHN COLLOPY (BADGE NO. 998) and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Officer Adam Carney
as 5:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
Quirino Torres
Defendant:
Officer FNU Carne, Bexar County Adult Detention Center and Officer Adam Carney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. Pena et al
as 3:2021cv00683
Defendant:
Officer Goldsborough, Officer Pearl Rogers, Police Officer #2146 and others
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Jose Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neely v. Swinehart et al
as 1:2020cv00433
Defendant:
Officer Adam Swinehart, Deputy S. Geist, S Geist and others
Plaintiff:
William Neely
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
